Also known as an index case, patient zero is a term used to describe the first human infected by a viral or bacterial disease in an outbreak. Advances in genetic analysis now make it possible to trace back the lineage of a virus through those it has infected. Combined with epidemiological studies, scientists can pinpoint individuals who may have been the first people to start spreading the disease and so trigger the outbreak.
Identifying who these people are can help address crucial questions about how, when and why it started. These can then help to prevent more people from getting infected now or in future outbreaks. Do we know who patient zero is in the Covid-19 coronavirus outbreak that started in China? The short answer is – no.
Chinese authorities originally reported that the first coronavirus case was on 31 December and many of the first cases of the pneumonia-like infection were immediately connected to a seafood and animal market in Wuhan, in the Hubei province.
This region is the epicentre of the outbreak, with almost 82% of the 75,000-plus cases registered so far in China and globally are from here, according to statistics complied by Johns Hopkins University. (Read more about the global fight against coronavirus.)
However, a study, by Chinese researchers published in the Lancet medical journal, claimed the first person to be diagnosed with Covid-19, was on 1 December 2019 (a lot of earlier) and that person had "no contact" with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.
Wu Wenjuan, a senior doctor at Wuhan's Jinyintan Hospital and one of the authors of the study, told the BBC Chinese Service that the patient was an elderly man who suffered from Alzheimer's disease. "He (the patient) lived four or five buses away from the seafood market, and because he was sick he basically didn't go out,” Wu Wenjuan said.
She also said that three other people developed symptoms in the following days – two of whom had no exposure to Huanan either. However, the researchers also found that 27 people of a sample of 41 patients admitted to hospital in the early stages of the outbreak "had been exposed to the market".
The hypothesis that the outbreak started at the market and could have been transmitted from a living animal to a human host before spreading human-to-human is still considered the most likely, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).
(Blogger's notes: Some Chinese I know used to joke that one can't even fart in Communist China without local Party bosses knowing it. Is it believable that the Chinese Communist Party still does not know who and where the patient zero of the Wuhan Virus Outbreak is? Rumours and innuendos are the natural weapons of the oppressed to counter the blatant concealment and outright lies of the oppressive ruling class.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Following research paper is written by two Chinese scientists and published in mid February. But they later withdrew, under pressure from Chinese Communist Party, from the publication.
The Possible Origins of 2019-nCoV Coronavirus
The
possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus by Botao Xiao1,2* and Lei Xiao3:
1
Joint International Research Laboratory of Synthetic Biology and Medicine,
School of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of
Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074,
China
3 Tian
You Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430064,
China
*
Corresponding author: xiaob@scut.edu.cn Tel / Fax: 86-20-3938-0631
The
2019-nCoV coronavirus has caused an epidemic of 28,060 laboratory-confirmed
infections in human including 564 deaths in China by February 6, 2020. Two
descriptions of the virus published on
Nature this week indicated that the
genome sequences from patients were 96% or
89% identical to the Bat CoV ZC45 coronavirus originally found in
Rhinolophus affinis 1,2.
It was
critical to study where the pathogen came
from and how it passed onto human. An article published on The Lancet
reported that 41 people in Wuhan were found
to have the acute respiratory syndrome and 27 of them had
contact with Huanan
Seafood Market 3.
The
2019-nCoV was found in 33 out of 585 samples collected in the market after the
outbreak. The market was suspicious to be
the origin of the epidemic, and was shut down according to the rule of quarantine
the source during an epidemic.
The
bats carrying CoV ZC45
were originally found in Yunnan or Zhejiang province, both of which were more than 900 kilometers away from
the seafood market. Bats were normally found to live in caves and trees.
But the seafood market is in a densely-populated district of Wuhan, a
metropolitan of ~15 million people. The probability was very low for the bats
to fly to the market.
According to municipal reports and the
testimonies of 31 residents and 28 visitors, the bat was never a food source in
the city, and no bat was traded in the market. There was possible natural
recombination or intermediate host of the coronavirus, yet little proof has
been reported. Was there any
other possible pathway?
We screened the
area around the seafood market and identified two
laboratories conducting research on bat coronavirus. Within ~280 meters from
the market, there
was the Wuhan
Center for Disease
Control & Prevention (WHCDC) (Figure from Baidu and Google maps).
WHCDC
hosted animals in laboratories for research purpose, one of which was
specialized in pathogens collection and identification 4-6. In
one of their
studies, 155 bats
including Rhinolophus affinis
were captured in
Hubei province, and other 450 bats were captured in Zhejiang province 4.
The expert in collection was noted in
the Author Contributions (JHT).
Moreover,
he was broadcasted for collecting viruses on nation-wide newspapers and
websites in 2017 and 2019 7,8. He described that he was once attacked
by bats and the blood of
a bat shot on
his skin. He knew
the extreme danger of the infection so he quarantined himself for 14
days 7.
In
another accident, he quarantined himself again because bats peed on him. He was
once thrilled for capturing a bat carrying a live tick 8. Surgery was performed on the caged animals
and the tissue samples were collected for DNA and RNA extraction and sequencing
4, 5. The tissue samples and contaminated trashes were source
of pathogens.
They were
only ~280 meters
from the seafood
market. The WHCDC was also
adjacent to the Union Hospital where the first group of
doctors were infected during this epidemic. It is plausible that the virus leaked around and some of them
contaminated the initial patients
in this epidemic,
though solid proofs are needed in future study.
The
second laboratory was ~12 kilometers from the seafood market and belonged to Wuhan
Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1, 9, 10. This laboratory
reported that the Chinese horseshoe bats were natural reservoirs for the severe
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) which caused the 2002-3
pandemic 9.
The
principle investigator participated in a project which generated a chimeric
virus using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, and reported the potential
for human emergence 10. A direct speculation was that SARS-CoV or its
derivative might leak from the laboratory.
In
summary, somebody was entangled with the evolution of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. In
addition to origins of natural recombination and intermediate host, the killer
coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan. Safety level may
need to be reinforced in high risk biohazardous
laboratories. Regulations may be
taken to relocate
these laboratories far away from city center and other densely populated
places.
Contributors
BX designed the comment and performed literature search. All authors performed
data acquisition and analysis, collected documents, draw the figure, and wrote
the papers.
Acknowledgements This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772133, 11372116).
Declaration of interests: All authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11772133, 11372116).
Declaration of interests: All authors declare no competing interests.
References
1. Zhou
P, Yang X-L,
Wang X-G, et
al. A pneumonia
outbreak associated with
a new coronavirus of probable bat
origin. Nature 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7.
2. Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, et al. A new coronavirus
associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3.
3. Huang
C, Wang Y,
Li X, et
al. Clinical features
of patients infected
with 2019 novel coronavirus in
Wuhan, China. The Lancet
2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183- 5.
4. Guo WP, Lin XD, Wang W, et al. Phylogeny and
origins of hantaviruses harbored by bats, insectivores, and rodents. PLoS
pathogens 2013; 9(2): e1003159.
5. Lu M, Tian JH, Yu B, Guo WP, Holmes EC, Zhang
YZ. Extensive diversity of rickettsiales bacteria in ticks from Wuhan, China.
Ticks and tick-borne diseases 2017; 8(4): 574-80.
6. Shi M, Lin XD, Chen X, et al. The
evolutionary history of vertebrate RNA viruses. Nature 2018; 556(7700):
197-202.
7. Tao P. Expert in Wuhan collected ten
thousands animals: capture bats in mountain at night. Changjiang Times 2017.
8. Li QX, Zhanyao. Playing with elephant dung,
fishing for sea bottom mud: the work that will change China's future. thepaper
2019.
9. Ge XY, Li JL, Yang XL, et al. Isolation and
characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor.
Nature 2013; 503(7477): 535-8. 10.
Menachery VD, Yount
BL, Jr., Debbink
K, et al. A SARS-like
cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human
emergence. Nature medicine 2015; 21(12): 1508-13.