Glenn Hubbard the Romney's Economist from Columbia. |
Having
framed this idea as preposterous, Mr. Velshi introduced R. Glenn Hubbard, the
dean of Columbia Business School, a Romney campaign adviser and a “very smart
man,” as the host put it. So smart, Mr. Velshi told Mr. Hubbard, that “you
couldn’t have been involved in the writing of that policy.” Why? “Because you
would know that that is just not possible.”
Wearing a
dark suit and projecting an air of geeky, avuncular calm, Mr. Hubbard appeared
before a blue backdrop festooned with the words “Columbia Business School.” If
he was supposed to be cowed or disarmed by the bluster or flattery, he did not
show it.
“It is
absolutely possible, Ali, both in terms of models of policy effects on the
recovery and historical experience,” he said, in a tone that was professorial
but not patronizing, “If you look at the recovery from ’74, ’75, or ’81, ’82,
you can easily get job growth in this range. We have the wrong policy mix.
We’ve had a nasty shock, we’re in a different situation, but we could do a lot
better.”
Succinct,
authoritative and unabashedly partisan. Leave aside that most economists see a
vast difference between the recessions of the ’70s and ’80s and the crisis that
began in 2008. This was exactly the sort of performance Mr. Hubbard has been
delivering for the Republican candidate, both on television and in op-ed
articles, for more than a year. Straddling the occasionally uncomfortable line
between academia and politics, Mr. Hubbard is playing a role now familiar in
modern campaigns: the in-house economist.
Mr. Hubbard
has helped to draft many of Mr. Romney’s economic and tax policies, and, at
least implicitly, lent his imprimatur to others he did not conceive. The
benefits are potentially mutual. If Mr. Romney is elected, Mr. Hubbard is
considered a strong candidate for the job of Treasury secretary and even, after
Ben S. Bernanke’s term expires, chairman of the Federal Reserve.
(Robert Zoellick, former president of the World Bank, is another possible contender for the Treasury job.)
(Robert Zoellick, former president of the World Bank, is another possible contender for the Treasury job.)
To the job
of in-house economist, Mr. Hubbard brings a rare ability to translate complex
policy into plain English, as well as a conservative’s love for small
government and a faith that cutting taxes will spur growth. During a stint as
chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers for President George W. Bush, from
2001 to 2003, Mr. Hubbard was known as the principal architect of the Bush tax cuts.
Mr. Hubbard also brings to this job a certain amount of baggage. He appeared briefly in “Inside Job,” a scathing and Oscar-winning 2010 documentary about the financial crisis. The film has a segment about high-profile professors who blessed many of the financial instruments that led to the fiasco. Enter Mr. Hubbard, who is presented as a leading thinker far too cozy with industries he ought to be assessing at a critical distance.
“You have
three more minutes,” he tells an interviewer who is pressing for the names of
his consulting clients. And then, as his face contorts with rage, he adds,
“Give it your best shot.”
MR. HUBBARD
is hardly the only marquee economist to parlay his experience and stature into
millions of dollars, for speeches, papers and expert witness testimony.
Lawrence H. Summers, once the Obama administration’s top economic
adviser, pocketed about
$5.2 million in compensation for giving
advice to a hedge fund. But in Mr. Hubbard’s case, some of his amply
compensated work takes policy stands that buttress the viewpoints of the
corporate interests that are paying him.
That’s been
true of the mutual fund industry, which has paid him more than $1 million over the
years. In an academic paper and a book, he took a strong position favoring the
industry’s approach to fees, which critics say hurt everyday investors. He was
paid what he called an honorarium of $150,000 for the academic paper by the
insurance arm of theInvestment Company Institute,
the mutual fund industry trade and lobbying group.
“Dean
Hubbard is a mercenary,” says John
P. Freeman, emeritus professor of business
and professional ethics at the University of South Carolina School of Law, who
has accused the mutual fund industry of profiteering, “out to protect fund
managers who are taking advantage of investors.”
Mr. Hubbard
says the source of funding is irrelevant because his academic writing stands on
its own.
(Please continue reading at the New York Times)
(Glenn Hubbard's Interview on CNN.)
(Glenn Hubbard Scene from "Inside Job".)
(Please continue reading at the New York Times)